How the guide thinks

Research & methods

The project separates observation, published evidence, keeper convention, and editorial recommendation so readers can see how strongly a statement is supported.

01

Strong evidence

Multiple relevant sources or a particularly direct body of evidence.

02

Moderate evidence

Useful evidence with limits in scope, setting, or replication.

03

Limited evidence

Sparse or indirect evidence that requires cautious interpretation.

04

Husbandry consensus

A repeated practice in experienced husbandry, distinguished from research.

05

Author recommendation

An explicit editorial judgment made by this guide.

Editorial workflow

  1. Start with a specific, testable husbandry claim.
  2. Trace it to primary literature or an authoritative source.
  3. Record scope, limits, and relevance to captive care.
  4. Assign an evidence label and attach citations at claim level.
  5. Review the chapter date and status when evidence changes.
Browse references →